According to Euromonitor, global sales of healthy food products are estimated to reach $1 trillion by 2017. The Nielsen’s 2015 Global Health & Wellness Survey showcased how consumers are ready to pay more for products that claim to boost health and weight loss, with 88% of those polled in the survey stating they were willing to pay more for healthier foods. But are the foods marketed to us in the supermarket as ‘healthy options’ really good for us?
This years CHOICE Shonky Awards have been revealed, and surprise, surprised, the consumer group found that Milos, aka. “delicious chocolate dirt” health star rating is well, a load of dirt.
The product, which proudly displays 4.5 Health Star Rating on its tin, was called out after its health claim was calculated by mixing just three teaspoons of Milo with skim milk.
Milo is actually 46 per cent sugar, so if you remove the core dairy product in the calculation, the malt chocolate sugar dirt scores a shameful 1½ health stars when assessed on its own.
CHOICE performed a survey and found only 13 % of Aussies like to drink Milo with skim milk. But what about the rest of us who like to put Milo on ice-cream or eat it straight out of the jar? This is where it gets funny, putting Milo on full cream vanilla ice cream still gets a better Health Star Rating than just three teaspoons of straight Milo!
Which just proves, you can’t always trust items which are being sold to us as being ‘healthy’ options.
When people tell me it’s expensive to eat healthy, I always get a little confused until I my next trip to the supermarket. Whilst recently in my local grocery store, I noticed something all too familiar in the dairy section.
When I compared two 500g containers of cottage cheese side-by-side I noticed they both had similar nutritional values, yet two very different prices.
Cottage Cheese (97% Fat Free)
Information (per 100g)
|Energy||85 cal||91 cal||86 cal|
With prices ranging from $0.58 to $1.48 per 100g, most people would expect the more expensive product to be significantly more premium in its nutritional value. But even when we look at the ingredients, this is simply not the case when we take away the fancy wording.
Bulla: Fresh Skim Milk (92%), Fresh Cream, Milk Solids, Salt, Preservative (202), Thickeners (412, 415, 410, 407a), Acidity Regulator (330), Culture.
Weight Watchers: Skim Milk Curd (Skim Milk, Culture, Non-Animal Rennet), Concentrated Skim Milk, Cream, Salt, Whey Powder, Food Acid (330), Preservative (202), Vegetable Gums (410, 412, 415).
Coles: Skim Milk Curd (Skim Milk, Culture, Non-Animal Rennet), Concentrated Skim Milk, Cream, Salt, Food Acid (330), Vegetable Gums (410, 412, 415), Preservative (202).
There’s a term in marketing known as the Halo Effect which refers to messages company’s use to to persuade consumers their product is healthier or better than other similar products. Phrases such as “healthy”, “natural”, “whole-grains” and “gluten free” are often used in brand names and product names, yet they do not guarantee a product is superior.
We can see this when we look at another basic household ‘health food’ staple, muesli.
Information (per 45g)
|Carman’s Natural Bircher Muesli||Lowans Original Harvest Muesli||Coles Muesli|
|Cost (Coles)||$1.25 per 100g||$0.53 per 100g||$0.28 per 100g|
|Energy||188 cal||181k cal||153 cal|
So next time you’re in the grocery store take a moment and look at your options, as the one claiming to be ‘healthy’ may in fact be costing you a premium simply because of its labelling, packaging or selective wording rather than any true health benefits.
Tags: branding, calories, dieting, eating, Fat Loss, groceries, healthy, healthy eating, healthy living, nutritional advice, shopping, unhealthy, Weight Loss